In every election the people we elect are often more important than the party. We need people whom we can trust will actually stand up for us in the new Parliament. I live in Ottawa Centre and have a great MP, Paul Dewar who I support for re-election. And I am confident he will be re-elected. But regardless of the shape and configuration of the next Parliament, Paul will need strong and progressive people around him. If you already have a progessive MP then please work to re-elect them. But they will need help.
Here are a few candidates who have a track record of supporting social justice issues and deserve our support in any way that we can. I know there are others. Let me know your choices and we’ll keep adding to the list.
Peggy Nash Parkdale-High Park
Nycole Turmel Hull-Aylmer
http://nycoleturmel.ndp.ca/about
Mark Rogers Kings-Hants
Jinny Sims Newton-North Delta
Dennis Lewycky Winnipeg South Centre
Robert Chisholm Darthmouth-Cole Harbour
http://robertchisholm.ndp.ca/about
Nettie Wiebe Saskatoon-Rosetown-Biggar
http://nettiewiebe.ndp.ca/about
Tania Cameron Kenora
After one week of the Federal Election campaign Stephen Harper is inches away from majority territory in all of the polls. But he’s not there yet and if we all work hard he never will.
I’m not a big fan of strategic voting but if we want to stop a Harper Majority then there are about between 30 and 40 seats right now (according to projections by ThreeHundredEight.com) that can certainly be influenced if enough people bother to vote, and vote for the left of centre candidate who can win in their riding. If the Tories lose these seats then we at least survive the election and can build for a progressive Canada. If they win a dozen or so of these, our Canadian goose is cooked.
Below is the list of seats that I think hold our best hopes. There may be others and if you think there are then go for it. If you live in any of these ridings and want to stop a Harper majority then think about working or voting for the best non-Tory candidate who could win. Your vote can make a difference. If you don’t live in any of these ridings but have relatives, friends, neighbours, fellow country men and women who do then maybe you could it a shot to persuade, cajole, or influence them to do the right thing. Please give it a shot. Finally if you want to do something tangible to stop a Harper Majority then please consider a donation to one of these campaigns that is working so hard to do so.
Apologies in advance if I offend anyone in the political spectrum but I am willing to withstand the scorn, at least for a couple of more weeks. I also have to admit that I do not personally know all of the suggested candidates in all of these ridings, but the ones I do (like Nycole Turmel in Hull-Aylmer) are solid people who will work with us in the future.
After so much pleadings and pleadings, enough from me. Here is your list!! These are numbers crunched by the good folks at ThreeHundredEight.com and reflect the latest national, regional and local polling available. If you want to know how they do it the drop in and see them.
British Columbia
Burnaby-Douglas NDP behind Cons -4
Saanich-Gulf Islands Green behind Cons -9
Vancouver Island North NDP behind Cons -8
Alberta
Edmonton Centre Lib behind Cons -2
Edmonton East NDP behind Cons -19 (Hey, it’s Alberta)
Saskatchewan
Sask-Rosetown-Biggar NDP behind Cons -14
Desnethe-Missinippi- Churchill River Lib behind Cons -7
Manitoba
Elmwood-Transcona Tie NDP-Cons
Saint Boniface Lib behind Cons -3
Winnipeg South Lib behind Cons -6
Ontario
Ajax-Pickering Lib behind Cons -2
Brampton-Springdale Lib behind Cons -2
Brampton West Tie Lib-Cons
Eglinton-Lawrence Tie Lib-Cons
Guelph Lib ahead of Cons +2
Kingston Tie Lib-Cons
Kitchener-Centre Lib behind Cons -4
Kitchener-Waterloo Tie Lib-Cons
Mississauga-Erindale Lib behind Cons -4
Mississauga-South Tie Lib-Cons
Oakridges-Markham Lib behind Cons -8
Ottawa-Orleans Lib behind Cons -8
Sault Ste Marie Tie NDP-Cons
Vaughn Lib behind Cons -2
Welland NDP behind Cons -6
Newfoundland and Labrador
St. John’s South-Mount Pearl Lib ahead of Cons +2
PEI
Egmont Lib behind Cons -6
Nova Scotia
West Nova Lib behind Cons -6
New Brunswick
Miramichi Lib behind Cons -7
Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe Lib ahead of Cons +2
St. John Lib behind Cons -4
Canadians for Tax Fairness have gone live. Check out their new website and sign the petition to Stop Corporate Tax cuts
Again, and again and now once again, the majority of Canadains do not want their Government to hand out tax gifts to big corporations or buy a new fleet of fighter jets.
Is anyone listening? We have the Majority.
If you listen to Stephen Harper it is all about the other political parties and their evil desire to destroy our fragile recovery for partisan political gain. Pleeeeeeeeeeeease! Give me a break.
If we have another federal election, and it looks like we will be going to the polls in May then there is only one person to blame for that. Mr. Stephen Harper himself. For the last five years there has only been one party in power in Canada, the Conservatives. They have been running the show, turning on the Christmas lights on Parliament Hill and unveiling huge chunks of our money from coast to coast as evidence of first the New Government and now just the plain old Harper Government. They have been in power, not some dreamed up Coalition, not the Toronto “elites” and certainly not the bogeymen trio of unions, socialists and separatists.
Unfortunately for Emperor Harper (that’s what he will be called if he wins a majority) some of us remember what he promised Canadians five years ago. Improved transparency- nope, Increased accountability-nope, Scandal-free government-not so much and finally Fixed Term Elections. On November 6, 2006 the Parliament of Canada passed Bill C-16 that requires a general election to take place in the fourth calendar year after the previous poll. Now maybe Mr. Harper is confused and may he has forgotten but in May, 2006 he said that his government’s fixed-election-date legislation would prevent future governments from calling snap elections for “short-term advantage.” And further that “Fixed dates stop leaders from trying to manipulate the calendar”.
The reason that we are having a federal election this year, despite his comments and his grand legislation is that Stephen (would be Emperor) Harper has manipulated the calendar so that we will have one. He has done that because quite frankly he continues to refuse to accept that Canadians want a minority government and that we want him to make it work, for us, and not for his ego.
Since he has first been elected Mr. Harper has refused to cooperate with the other political parties, has ignored the will of Parliament, and developed and delivered a plan to neuter the Parliamentary Committee system. In other words he has been a bully. And he is mad because he still can’t get his own way. That’s why we’re having another election.
But if Mr. Harper (soon to be I hope, back at the National Citizens Coalition where bullying is encouraged) is in for another big disappointment if he thinks that Canadians will give him the power that he craves. Canadians want a government that listens to them, follows their general direction, and speaks on behalf of all Canadians and not just their own political views. That is our history and our tradition. Those like Mr. Harper who ignore history might just find that it bites them in the ass.
Sorry for my crude simplicity but any budget that allows $6 billion dollars in corporate tax cuts and gives $2 a day more to seniors who are going to food banks just plain sucks. There is nothing in this budget to help anybody but the Tories try to get re-elected. Oh yeah, there’s a new tax credit for children’s art classes but the millions of parents who watched their kids go to bed hungry tonite are never going to be able to claim that because they don’t have enough income.
There is nothing to help our struggling aboriginal communities except for $22 million to fix up a few of their leaking fuel tanks and maybe help a couple of them get clean drinking water. Think about it folks, they didn’t even give enough money to ensure that all aboriginal communities have clean water. This is 2011 not 1811. No wonder many aboriginal people wish we had never come here. They had a better life back before Canada.
Most of all what this budget does is entrench the wealth in this country in the hands of a very few already very rich Canadians. The gap between the ultra rich and the other 95% of us will continue to grow and those at the bottom of the heap are guaranteed to stay there. This is a status quo budget, unfortunately none but a select few have any status with the Harper Government.
This is also an iceberg budget. What you see on the surface is just posturing for Bay Street support for the up-coming election and pandering to the suburban and rural voters that the Tories would like to hang onto. Underneath are very real and serious cuts to public services, transfers to provinces, and a continuation of the undermining of any kind of equality in this country. We won’t see these cuts until after the election but the impact will be long and severe.
There was never a case of a budget that did so much for so few and so little for the many. This budget sucks.
A recent issue of the Economist magazine highlighted a concern that countries across the world are grappling with; how to deal with the growing income inequality in modern society. This is a problem that is particularly acute in both developed and developing countries from China to Brazil and from Britain to right here in Canada. Why is it a problem?
There may always be rich and poor among us but for the last twenty years the gap between the groups has been growing at a pace that according to the Economist, even the bankers and industrialists in Davos are worried about. When one segment of the economy moves so far ahead of the others that you cannot no longer see the smoke from their caboose then there is a real and pressing concern that the others might react unfavourably through labour unrest or even revolution. Certainly that is an issue in places like China and other newly emerging economies. Even the steel-willed rulers of the Communist regime know that there must be a strong middle class to ensure continued growth and stability.
In Canada we seem to have forgotten these lessons. It’s not likely that Canadian workers are poised to revolt but if you look at the data then you could understand their unhappiness. The Canadian economic pie has undergone a radical re-slicing in the last ten years and while we have had a period of unprecedented growth the richest Canadians have taken the lion’s share of the profit and glory. According to the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives the richest 1% of our population accumulated one third of all income gains during this period, leaving the rest of us to scrabble over the remains. To add to their economic gains they also got to keep more of it thanks to generous personal and corporate tax reductions that far outstripped the minimal tax cuts for middle class Canadians.
How bad is it in Canada? Pretty bad. In fact Canada has one of the worst records in the world when it comes to the equality gap. In 2008 the respected Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development warned Canada that we were on a slippery slope and that the income gap in Canada between rich and poor was growing faster than almost all of the other developed countries in the world and that we had to take steps to deal with it.
This massive wealth transfer has already had an enormous impact on our social cohesiveness, one of the major sustaining pillars of our Canadian society. Those who fall out of work because of a downsizing, privatization or globalization of the economy have few supports to help them get back in the game and find themselves and their families just barely surviving. They join the structural poor including but not limited to aboriginal peoples both on and off reserve, people with disabilities and seniors, especially senior women all whom are struggling to stay alive at incomes of less than $20,000 a year.
If there was ever a sign that we have a problem with inequality in Canada one only needs to look at the growth in the new industry of food banks. In 2009 close to 800,000 people accessed food banks every month in Canada and 37% of these were children. A stark and depressing reality is that 14% of all people who went to the food bank in 2009 actually had a job.
These poor within us are more likely to face life situations with higher murder rates and lower life expectancy and according to the Equality Project in the United Kingdom fare worse in all manners of social indicators from poorer health to more likelihood of drug dependency to the weaker educational performance of their children. These are not simply other people’s problems that we can ignore. They show up in crime statistics, in our prison population and in our health facilities. Together we pay for the costs of the growing inequality.
But perhaps it is the Canadian middle class who have paid the most for the growing inequality in our society. As each economic tsunami moves through our society we are working harder, longer, for less. At least in comparison to our richer and usually corporate cousins. Despite being better educated than any generation in history our median pre-tax incomes are about the same level today as they were in 1980. Where did all of the wealth that was created during this period go? It went to the richest among us.
So what can we do about the situation? How can we get the tide to start flowing in the right direction again? It is clear that the status quo will not help, in fact this trickle up theory of peanuts for the poor and tax cuts for the wealthy doesn’t work at all and unless you are a banking executive, a corporate bigwig, or a cabinet minister you can look forward to having less in your pocket for retirement, assuming and hoping you get there.
Canadians know that this situation is unfair and untenable. A recent Focus Canada survey by Environics Research pointed out the obvious. Two-thirds of Canadians believe the disparities in income between rich and poor in this country are growing and eighty percent believe that government has a responsibility to reduce such disparities. So what can governments do? At a very minimum they should follow the Hippocratic Oath and first do no harm. Maybe that should be do no further harm. A welcome and overdue step in the right direction would be for the Conservative Government to cancel the latest round of corporate tax cuts. They simply reward wealthy corporations at a direct cost to taxpayers who will have to pay the money back.
But there is much more to do in both the short and long term. Investment in infrastructure, income supports for the unemployed and low income Canadians and housing initiatives have a direct impact on not only reducing income disparities but even according to Finance Department officials are better for job creation and economic growth than another round of tax giveaways to the corporate rich. In the longer term the Federal Government needs to revamp the taxation system to restore some semblance of fairness and to launch a clear poverty reduction strategy with targets and timelines in partnership with the provinces and territories.
It’s more than time to develop and implement strategies to deal with our growing inequality gap and a Federal Budget is a good place to begin that debate. If not then there will be a Federal Election some time soon and Canadians should demand and not just ask their political leaders what they are doing to make Canada a fair place to work and live.
This is one article that I almost didn’t write. It’s been so long since Canadians have had a debate about military spending that we’ve forgotten how to do it. For the last number of years the only question up for “debate” was whether or not you “supported the troops”. This narrowing of public dialogue only served to shut people up because if you disagreed with the war in Afghanistan and Canada’s mission there you clearly did not “support the troops.” And therefore your opinion didn’t count.
Well, I do support the troops, at least the rank and file members of the Canadian Armed Forces and the civilians who help support their work. I do not support the Generals at NDHQ nor the politicians of all stripes and colours who agreed to the current military mission in that part of the world. I support the troops having the necessary tools and equipment to do their job and I even support paying them a lot more money to do a dangerous job on our behalf.
I would just like us to have a say on what that job is going to be. And I don’t mean a debate in the loony bin on Parliament Hill. I mean a real honest discussion with Canadians from coast to coast to coast on what role we want our military to play in serving us at home and around the world.
There are two issues that have prompted my thinking about this issue. First of all there is the imminent purchase of a new batch of fighter jets. The second is the release of a report on Canadian military spending produced by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Please see: http://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/National%20Office/2011/03/Canadian%20Military%20Spending%202010.pdf
I must admit that I don’t know anything about fighter jets but to purchase 65 F-35 stealth aircraft at an initial cost of over $9 billion and a long term expense of $30 billion should concern anyone. I am troubled by the expenditure of so much money but I am more concerned with exactly what they are going to be used for. Yet there is absolutely no public discussion about this at all. Are they going to be used to defend us? If yes, from whom? I thought the Cold War was over. If they are going to be used to attack someone, then whom? Or maybe that decision is already made as well.
The review by the CCPA is much too technical for me but the numbers are a bit staggering. I did not know that we will spend close to $23 billion in military expenditures this year. Nor did I know that this is as much as we spent at the peak of the Cold War. A lot of this has to do with the Afghan war which according to the CCPA accounts for about half of the total increase but even after we end our “military mission” in Afghanistan the military expenditures are budgeted to continue to rise. What is up with that? After every war in the past we received a “peace dividend”. I am not a military analyst but looks like that dividend is going to be spent on fighter jets.
The other important issue raised in the CCPA report is Canada’s recent dismal role in peacekeeping. For the country that invented peacekeeping it is a disgrace to find that in 2010 we contributed just 56 military personnel to peacekeeping operations. That massive show of force was divided among 7 operations. It wasn’t like there wasn’t any peacekeeping happening in the world. Last year there were 15 operations that involved 84,316 UN peacekeeping troops. We just weren’t involved.
So what do I want to see changed? I want to see the fighter jets cancelled. I want to see a real “peace dividend” by a reduction in the overall military spending that reflects the military’s reduced costs when we end the military mission in Afghanistan and I want some reordering of our military spending to reflect a wider range of Canadian views than just the Generals who seem to hold every in thrall and rapt silence.
I want my Canadian military to be there for us, just like they were during the ice storm, the floods in Quebec and in Newfoundland after Hurricane Igor. I want them to help patrol our waters and support search and rescue. I want them to show our face to the world, not just through guns and artillery but in humanitarian missions and disaster relief. And most of all I want them to be restore our image in the world as peacekeepers. At one time if you travelled the world you proudly displayed the Maple Leaf and were known and respected as part of the world that believed in creating solutions and not adding to the problem. Today, in many parts of the world, Canada and Canadians are not seen that way anymore. I want that legacy back so that I can pass it on to future generations.
Military spending is one way in which we define ourselves as a country. I just want everyone to have a say in how those choices are made. I would love to hear your views, either publicly or in private. Let’s open up the discussion!!

Conservative Taxpayers Federation
Lest there be any doubt where the Canadian Taxpayers Federation’s loyalties lie we now have the latest CTF leader to join the ranks of full-fledged Tories. Kevin Gaudet, former federal and Ontario director of the Canadian Taxpayers’ Federation, will be acclaimed as the candidate in the riding of Pickering-Scarborough East. He will replace Salman Farooq, who quietly abandoned his provincial election bid last month days before being charged with fraud.
This is not Gaudet’s first try at getting elected. He ran as the Reform candidate in the 1995 Federal By-Election in Ottawa-Vanier.
I guess the CTF is more concerned with their personal electoral success than “protecting taxpayers.”
Just to remind you of some other former CTFers turned Tory:
Jason Kenney, Former CEO: Federal Minister of Citizenship and Immigration.
John Carpay, Former Alberta director: Reform Party candidate in the riding of Burnaby-Kingsway in the 1993 federal election.
Walter Robinson, Federal director from 1998 to 2004: He left the position to run as a Conservative in the 2004 Federal Election in Ottawa-Orleans.
John Williamson, Former Ontario spokesperson and Federal director: He served as Stephen Harper’s Communication Director and is the Federal Conservative candidate for the riding of New Brunswick Southwest for the next election.